Rating: 4.2/5 Best for: Mid-to-large scale EPCs in Oil & Gas, Power, and Marine industries. Overview AVEVA E3D 2.1 sits in an interesting period of the software’s lifecycle. It is mature enough to have ironed out the early bugs of the initial 2.0 release, yet it predates the heavy cloud and collaboration pushes of later versions. For teams migrating from the legacy PDMS (Plant Design Management System), version 2.1 represents a stable, graphical improvement that maintains backward compatibility while offering a modernized interface. What’s Good (The Pros) 1. The Graphical Leap from PDMS The most immediate difference is the graphics engine. Compared to PDMS, E3D 2.1 is night and day. The DirectX-based rendering allows for realistic lighting, shadows, and textures. Navigating a densely packed pipe rack feels less like a wireframe maze and more like a real plant. Clash detection is visually intuitive thanks to real-time highlighting.

Even with a model containing tens of thousands of objects, panning, zooming, and view regeneration in 2.1 remained surprisingly snappy on standard workstation hardware (tested with an i7, 32GB RAM, and a Quadro P2200). The LOD (Level of Detail) management is robust.

Buy it if you are already an AVEVA/PDMS shop. Skip it if you are starting from scratch and can wait for E3D 2.2 or later with better cloud support.

Version 2.1 handles both parametric primitives (PDMS-style) and direct 2D/3D sketch-based modeling well. For structural steel modifications or creating custom equipment nozzles, the ability to sketch and extrude directly within the 3D view saves significant time.

Keep reading about 

Aveva E3d 2.1 Direct

Rating: 4.2/5 Best for: Mid-to-large scale EPCs in Oil & Gas, Power, and Marine industries. Overview AVEVA E3D 2.1 sits in an interesting period of the software’s lifecycle. It is mature enough to have ironed out the early bugs of the initial 2.0 release, yet it predates the heavy cloud and collaboration pushes of later versions. For teams migrating from the legacy PDMS (Plant Design Management System), version 2.1 represents a stable, graphical improvement that maintains backward compatibility while offering a modernized interface. What’s Good (The Pros) 1. The Graphical Leap from PDMS The most immediate difference is the graphics engine. Compared to PDMS, E3D 2.1 is night and day. The DirectX-based rendering allows for realistic lighting, shadows, and textures. Navigating a densely packed pipe rack feels less like a wireframe maze and more like a real plant. Clash detection is visually intuitive thanks to real-time highlighting.

Even with a model containing tens of thousands of objects, panning, zooming, and view regeneration in 2.1 remained surprisingly snappy on standard workstation hardware (tested with an i7, 32GB RAM, and a Quadro P2200). The LOD (Level of Detail) management is robust. aveva e3d 2.1

Buy it if you are already an AVEVA/PDMS shop. Skip it if you are starting from scratch and can wait for E3D 2.2 or later with better cloud support. Rating: 4

Version 2.1 handles both parametric primitives (PDMS-style) and direct 2D/3D sketch-based modeling well. For structural steel modifications or creating custom equipment nozzles, the ability to sketch and extrude directly within the 3D view saves significant time. For teams migrating from the legacy PDMS (Plant

In this React testing tutorial, we will introduce Enzyme in our Jest testing environment. Jest is commonly used as test runner -- to be able to run your test suites and test cases from the command…

The Road to React

Learn React by building real world applications. No setup configuration. No tooling. Plain React in 200+ pages of learning material. Learn React like 50.000+ readers.

Get it on Amazon.