Fylm Mektoub My Love Canto Uno 2017 Mtrjm - Fydyw Lfth -

This has led some critics (notably the Cahiers du Cinéma camp) to praise Canto Uno as a radical anti‑narrative, a film that captures what it feels like to be young and alive in the body, before stories and morals impose themselves. Others (especially at The Guardian and IndieWire ) have called it “three hours of bottom‑pinching” — a tedious, self‑indulgent male fantasy parading as art. The film arrived in the wake of the #MeToo movement, which made its release particularly awkward. Kechiche had already been accused of abusive working conditions during Blue Is the Warmest Colour (the actresses Léa Seydoux and Adèle Exarchopoulos spoke of “horrible” treatment). For Canto Uno , the non‑professional actor Ophélie Bau later alleged that certain intimate scenes were shot under pressure and that she felt exposed beyond what was agreed. Kechiche denied wrongdoing, but the controversy tinted the film’s reception.

Either reaction is valid. That, perhaps, is the mark of a film that truly matters. fylm Mektoub My Love Canto Uno 2017 mtrjm - fydyw lfth

The “story,” such as it is, involves romantic entanglements, jealousy, and the pull between tradition and liberation. But Kechiche deliberately undermines plot mechanics. Scenes stretch for ten, fifteen, sometimes twenty minutes. Dialogue is often secondary to gesture, glance, sweat, and the movement of hips. The film’s signature — and for many, its breaking point — is the camera’s relentless, almost predatory attention to the female body. Cinematographer Marco Graziaplena (working with Kechiche’s usual meticulousness) shoots in digital, often with a shallow depth of field that isolates curves of skin, the back of a knee, a strand of hair falling across a face. Nightclub sequences become near‑abstract studies of undulating flesh, shot from behind, below, and in extreme close‑up. The famous five‑minute sequence of Ophélie dancing solo to “Tanti bella cosi” by Fred Buscaglione is a case study: the camera does not cut; it circles, dips, rises, and presses against her body as if trying to merge with it. This has led some critics (notably the Cahiers

As an artwork, Mektoub, My Love: Canto Uno is deliberately excessive, arrogant, and polarizing. It asks: can a film be great even when its politics are dubious? Can beauty be separated from the ethics of its production? For every viewer who walks out in disgust, another stays mesmerized, drowning in the honey‑thick light of Sète. Canto Uno is not a film to like or dislike in any simple way. It is a film to wrestle with. It refuses to be summarized, refuses to be tamed, and refuses to apologize for its obsessions. If you have the patience to surrender to its rhythm — and the tolerance for a camera that stares a little too long, a little too intimately — you may find yourself haunted by its images for weeks. If not, you will likely leave angry, wondering why 179 minutes were needed to watch a man watch women. Kechiche had already been accused of abusive working

Abdellatif Kechiche’s Mektoub, My Love: Canto Uno arrives as the first part of an ambitious, sprawling diptych (followed by Intermezzo ). Premiering in competition at the Venice Film Festival in 2017, the film was met with sharp division: some hailed it as a liberating, sun‑drenched celebration of bodies and desire, while others condemned it as an exercise in narcissistic, interminable voyeurism. What is undeniable is that Canto Uno represents Kechiche pushing his already controversial aesthetic — familiar from The Secret of the Grain (2007) and Blue Is the Warmest Colour (2013) — to its most extreme, almost reckless, conclusion. Plot in Fragments The film follows Amin (Shaïn Boumediene), a young screenwriter who returns to his native town of Sète on the Mediterranean coast during the summer of 1994. He reconnects with his childhood friend Tony (Salim Kechiouche) and falls into a lazy, hedonistic rhythm of beach days, nightclubs, and family dinners. Amin is ostensibly working on a script, but the film has little interest in narrative progression. Instead, it drifts through a series of encounters with young women — notably the voluptuous, uninhibited Ophélie (Ophélie Bau, a remarkable non‑professional discovery) and the more enigmatic Céline (Hafsia Herzi) — while also lingering on the professional aspirations of others like the aspiring actress Camélia (Lou Luttiau).

This is not the cool, analytical gaze of Godard or the tender observation of Varda. It is possessive, hungry, and unashamedly male. Kechiche makes no effort to disguise the camera as an instrument of desire. Whether that desire is empathetic or exploitative is the central question the film forces upon its audience. Sound design is equally aggressive. The ambient noise of cicadas, the slurp of a glass of rosé, the wet smack of lips kissing — these are amplified to the point of hyper‑realism. Music is almost exclusively diegetic: Arabic pop, French variety, Italian canzone, and thumping club beats. There is no traditional score to guide emotion. The film’s rhythm is the rhythm of a long, lazy summer afternoon that gives way to a sleepless, sweat‑soaked night. The “Mektoub” Thesis “Mektoub” means “it is written” in Arabic — a nod to fatalism. Kechiche’s characters float as if carried by a current they cannot control. Amin watches rather than acts. Tony betrays and forgives. Ophélie gives her body freely, but her inner life remains largely opaque. The film refuses psychological depth in the conventional sense. Instead, meaning emerges from the accumulation of sensory data: the way light hits water, the texture of a wet T‑shirt, the exhaustion after dancing for hours.