Several essays explore how women writers (like Mary Astell, Eliza Haywood, and Frances Burney) reimagined private spaces as sites of intellectual labor, not just domestic retreat. Meanwhile, men’s access to public spaces like coffeehouses or Parliament came with their own performative pressures. The book pushes back on a simplistic “separate spheres” model, showing instead how spaces overlapped and leaked.
Check your university library, WorldCat, or Routledge’s website. (The 2014 hardcover is expensive, but many chapters are available via academic databases like JSTOR or Project MUSE.) A Final Thought Narain and Gevirtz remind us that for 18th-century Britons—especially women, queer people, and colonial subjects—space was a battleground. To be denied a room, a road, or a voice in Parliament was to be denied existence. Literature, then, became a way of mapping alternative geographies, of claiming symbolic space even when physical space was denied.
That idea—that space is gendered, and gender is spatialized—is the driving engine of the 2014 collection , edited by Mona Narain and Karen Gevirtz . Part of the British Literature in Context in the Long Eighteenth Century series, this volume offers a crucial intervention for students and scholars alike. What the Book Argues The central thesis is deceptively simple: Space is never neutral. Narain and Gevirtz bring together essays that examine how shifting definitions of public and private, urban and rural, domestic and foreign, directly influenced—and were influenced by—changing ideas about masculinity, femininity, and sexuality.