The main action in The Passion of the Christ consists of a man being horrifically beaten, mutilated, tortured, impaled, and finally executed. The film is grueling to watch — so much so that some critics have called it offensive, even sadistic, claiming that it fetishizes violence. Pointing to similar cruelties in Gibson’s earlier films, such as the brutal execution of William Wallace in Braveheart, critics allege that the film reflects an unhealthy fascination with gore and brutality on Gibson’s part.
Because the film is not really about romance—it’s about acceptance. Joe Black doesn’t come to punish or terrorize. He comes to learn why humans cling so desperately to life. And Bill Parrish teaches him: Because love makes time precious.
Meet Joe Black is a flawed, gorgeous, deeply earnest film—a dying breed in an age of irony. As Bill says near the end: “That’s what life is. A series of rooms. And who we stay with in each of them… that’s what matters.” This movie invites you to stay in its rooms for a while. It’s worth the visit. Meet Joe Black -1998-
At first glance, Meet Joe Black appears to be a relic of late-90s prestige filmmaking: a three-hour romantic fantasy drama starring Brad Pitt and Anthony Hopkins. But beneath its languid pacing and famously quirky premise lies one of the most ambitious and philosophical mainstream Hollywood films of its era—a film less concerned with plot than with the texture of mortality. Loosely based on the 1934 play Death Takes a Holiday , the film reimagines the Grim Reaper not as a cloaked specter, but as a strikingly beautiful young man (Brad Pitt) who emerges from the body of a deceased coffee shop patron. Death’s target—and temporary host family—is Bill Parrish (Anthony Hopkins), a wealthy, beloved media magnate celebrating his 65th birthday. Because the film is not really about romance—it’s
Three hours of Brad Pitt staring meaningfully at sunsets while eating peanut butter sounds like a parody. And Bill Parrish teaches him: Because love makes
Here’s a detailed feature on the 1998 film directed by Martin Brest. Feature: Meet Joe Black (1998) – A Meditation on Love, Death, and Peanut Butter Tagline: He’s expecting you.
The final shot—Joe releasing Bill’s hand, then walking back to the party as the real young man from the coffee shop returns—suggests a beautiful, haunting ambiguity: Is that Brad Pitt still Death, or the resurrected stranger? The film refuses to answer. Watch it if: You enjoy philosophical slow burns, Anthony Hopkins monologues, and movies that prioritize mood over plot.
The original DVD edition of The Passion of the Christ was a “bare bones” edition featuring only the film itself. This week’s two-disc “Definitive Edition” is packed with extras, from The Passion Recut (which trims about six minutes of some of the most intense violence) to four separate commentaries.
As I contemplate Mel Gibson’s The Passion of the Christ, the sequence I keep coming back to, again and again, is the scourging at the pillar.
Abraham Foxman of the Anti-Defamation League declared recently that Mel Gibson’s The Passion of the Christ is not antisemitic, and that Gibson himself is not an anti-Semite, but a “true believer.”
Link to this itemI read a review you wrote in the National Catholic Register about Mel Gibson’s film Apocalypto. I thoroughly enjoy reading the Register and from time to time I will brouse through your movie reviews to see what you have to say about the content of recent films, opinions I usually not only agree with but trust.
However, your recent review of Apocalypto was way off the mark. First of all the gore of Mel Gibson’s films are only to make them more realistic, and if you think that is too much, then you don’t belong watching a movie that can actually acurately show the suffering that people go through. The violence of the ancient Mayans can make your stomach turn just reading about it, and all Gibson wanted to do was accurately portray it. It would do you good to read up more about the ancient Mayans and you would discover that his film may not have even done justice itself to the kind of suffering ancient tribes went through at the hands of their hostile enemies.
Link to this itemIn your assessment of Apocalypto you made these statements:
Even in The Passion of the Christ, although enthusiastic commentators have suggested that the real brutality of Jesus’ passion exceeded that of the film, that Gibson actually toned down the violence in his depiction, realistically this is very likely an inversion of the truth. Certainly Jesus’ redemptive suffering exceeded what any film could depict, but in terms of actual physical violence the real scourging at the pillar could hardly have been as extreme as the film version.I am taking issue with the above comments for the following reasons. Gibson clearly states that his depiction of Christ’s suffering is based on the approved visions of Mother Mary of Agreda and Anne Catherine Emmerich. Having read substantial excerpts from the works of these mystics I would agree with his premise. They had very detailed images presented to them by God in order to give to humanity a clear picture of the physical and spiritual events in the life of Jesus Christ.
Copyright © 2000– Steven D. Greydanus. All rights reserved.