Because the idea of a tiny, perfect Rolls-Royce—a mechanical haiku of excess and restraint—is too beautiful to leave in the scrapheap of history.
The press was divided. The Economist called it "the anti-Rolls." Car Magazine declared it "brilliant but soulless." By late 1975, Rolls-Royce had invested over £4 million (roughly £40 million today) in the Baby. Three fully functional prototypes existed. Dealers in the US, the company's largest market, were shown sketches. Rolls Royce Baby -1975-
To save weight, the Baby abandoned the famous hydraulic self-leveling system of the Silver Shadow. In its place was a conventional coil-spring setup with anti-roll bars. Insiders at the time complained that it rode like a "well-dressed Citroën GS"—competent, but lacking the magic carpet glide. The Prototype Drive: What Was It Like? Automobile Quarterly was granted a clandestine test drive of a running mule in 1975 on a closed track at Millbrook. Their anonymous driver reported: "From the driver's seat, the Baby feels like a cruel joke. The doors shut with the correct library thud. The wood is genuine walnut, the leather from Connolly. But the moment you move, the illusion shatters. The engine hums, not murmurs. The steering is quick, almost nervous. It handles like a BMW—which is to say, not like a Rolls-Royce at all." The 0-60 mph time was a pedestrian 11.2 seconds. Top speed: 112 mph. Fuel economy: 19 mpg (impressive for 1975, but not revolutionary). Because the idea of a tiny, perfect Rolls-Royce—a
However, the Baby's DNA lived on. The lessons learned about lightweight construction and efficient packaging directly influenced the (1980) and, decades later, the Ghost (2009)—which is, in many ways, the Baby's final, successful form. Three fully functional prototypes existed